Craniofacial morphology in patients with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion

Vol. 55 No. 3 Suppl., 2014
This supplement was not sponsored by Outside Organizations.

ROMANIAN JOURNAL of MORPHOLOGY and EMBRYOLOGY

Dana Cristina Bratu, Raluca-Adriana Balan, Camelia-Alexandrina Szuhanek, Silvia-Izabella Pop, Emanuel Adrian Bratu, George Popa

Cephalometric analysis is frequently used in orthodontics for diagnostic purposes, in order to evaluate the positional relationship of the upper and lower jaw to the cranial base, as well as to objectively asses the way dental arches relate to one another and to the skeletal base. As with other dento-skeletal anomalies, the normal growth process can induce changes in these parameters. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes that occur in growing patients with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion. The study also focuses on analyzing and comparing several parameters in three groups of young patients of different ages, diagnosed with Class II division 2 malocclusion, in order to determine whether the anomaly worsens or improves during the patients growth period. A total of 25 lateral skull teleradiographs were analyzed using cephX. The patients were divided into three groups (Group 1: 6-8 years, Group 2: 9-14 years, Group 3: 15-18 years). We used the cephalometric parameters described in Bjork-Jarabak and Tweed analyses, as well as the relationship of the upper and lower central incisors to the skeletal landmarks. The statistical methods used in this study were the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the unpaired Student s t-test (p<0.05). We concluded that, during the physiological growth process, the Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion has the following cephalometric characteristics: the maxillary central incisors were in accentuated retroclination, the interincisal angle was very obtuse, the gonial angle showed lower than normal values towards the end of the growth period, the lower anterior face height was definitely decreased, the mandibular body length was shorter than normal in the early growth period and the tendency towards a hypodivergent skeletal pattern remained stable during growth.

Corresponding author: Raluca-Adriana Balan, University Assistant, DMD, PhD; e-mail: raluca_balan22@yahoo.com; George Popa, DMD, PhD Student; e-mail: georgepopa86@yahoo.com

Download PDF

ROMANIAN JOURNAL of MORPHOLOGY and EMBRYOLOGY

Oliver Arpad Vida, Catalin Pricop, Andrada Loghin, Luminita Cristina Chiutu, Orsolya Martha

Aim: To highlight the role of prostate rebiopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in cases with an atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) diagnosis on the initial biopsy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study on 1525 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy (PB) over a period of four years (2009-2012) was performed. For each patient the following were analyzed: age, prostate volume, digital rectal examination (DRE), serum total prostate specific antigen (tPSA), number of the cores taken. All PB were examined in HE staining and in difficult cases, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for basal cell markers was performed in order to establish a correct diagnosis. According to morphological criteria and IHC results, all PB were classified into four category of diagnosis: PCa, ASAP, high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and benign (including normal tissue, inflammatory lesions, and prostatic atrophy). In ASAP cases, a rebiopsy was performed. Results: PCa detection on the first biopsy was 69.77%, with a 3% incidence of ASAP and 1% of HGPIN, values similar with those in the literature. After rebiopsy the overall detection rate of PCa was improved to 71.01%, with a detection rate of 41.17% on the second biopsy. Conclusions: PCa diagnosis is the result of a complex algorithm including DRE, tPSA, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) examination and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is the key step of this algorithm; it confirms the diagnosis of PCa and must be repeated in cases with a solid clinical suspicion of PCa, whenever histopathological features are inconclusive even after IHC staining.

Corresponding author: Catalin Pricop, Associate Professor, MD, PhD; e-mail: bobopricop@yahoo.com

Download PDF
Download cover
Download contents

Journal archive